Project Management Stack Exchange is a question and answer site for project managers. Join them; it only takes a minute:

Sign up
Here's how it works:
  1. Anybody can ask a question
  2. Anybody can answer
  3. The best answers are voted up and rise to the top

When setting up a project, what are the advantages and disadvantages to using Summary Tasks vs Detail tasks as predecessors?

If it matters, I am experimenting with MS Project 2010 as a tool.

share|improve this question

Personal preference, but for me, I only group them by like kind (summary to summary, detail to detail).

Summary tasks are seen as separate work packages, ie: they summarize all of the tasks necessary to complete that particular part of the project. So if I link a Summary task to anything, it will be to another summary task (work package).

This also helps in the rollup view, as I can see how the various summaries (work packages) link together, with no linkages lost in the view.

share|improve this answer

I second Trevor's answer but would remove 'personal preference.' The schedule logic rests at your leaf level of the decomposition. Everything that matters to you as a PM occurs at this level; at the summary levels, things become hidden and your critical path becomes clugy. If you mix your predecessor-successor logic between levels, you will, not may, lose sight of accrued variances. They will not surface until later and you want to know these things earlier.

share|improve this answer
Thanks David. I added personal pref only because, as you know, when it comes PM's, there are no 'rules'. :) – Trevor K. Nelson May 8 '12 at 3:16

I wouldn't recommend linking summary tasks in MS Project for the following reasons:

  • it can make the logic difficult to follow, and make it hard to identify the Critical Path
  • it can cause logic errors which artifically extend the plan
  • it can lead to unnecessary bench time.
  • it can cause circular logic warnings

See for more information.

share|improve this answer
Welcome to PM:SE. +1 to the answer thank you for being informative, terse and providing a solid useful reference – Mark C. Wallace Nov 9 '12 at 19:58

Your Answer


By posting your answer, you agree to the privacy policy and terms of service.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.