Timeline for Should a client/customer be in the room or participating during planning poker?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
4 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
May 12, 2012 at 9:42 | comment | added | Bartek Kobyłecki | Maybe I was not clear enough - I agree with you that there must be a moment of 'quiet contemplation' as you write. What I meant was that it could be broken for a while IF there is will from the team to do so. For example if team estimates a task and gives 8, but knows it can be 5 if ie. textbox is generic then they can have option to ask customer/client that particular question. | |
May 12, 2012 at 9:22 | comment | added | jmort253 | Still, I would think there would be some part of the estimation phase where the dev's go into a state of quiet contemplation so they can actually go through each feature and calculate how long it will take. It's hard to do that with a bunch of nontechnicals asking you redundant questions while you're trying to think :) If there are areas where clarification is needed, then I think an estimation meeting with the client would then be in order :) | |
May 12, 2012 at 9:08 | comment | added | Bartek Kobyłecki | Good point with division meeting into elaborating/gathering (1) and estimating (2) phase. I would add that in the second phase client can be available to the team, so when during estimating team needs clarifications, they can ask client/customer directly. | |
May 12, 2012 at 4:22 | history | answered | jmort253 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |