How do you manage this scenario?
- UX and Visual design a feature.
- PO and DEV decided -after design got approved- to ignore some specs of implementation, so we have something different than the design specs.
Where should be located this information? Because SM ended up with a stakeholder discussion (PO is sick) and after his check of JIRA ticket he saw design and website implementation not aligned. After having created a bug a DEV told him that it was discussed with PO to be implemented like this. So the different design implementation is not reported anywhere.
In my opinion these (ignored) specs update should stay in the design page (Zeplin, Confluence, whatever…). Do you agree? Because otherwise for anyone who losts that info, this scenario may look like a BUG. The missing part then could be turned into a new FEATURE, with again added comments.
Do you agree? What do you think?