I agree on an idea of making teams cross-functional. However, I doubt that resources may not utilize effectively when the nature of the work varying sprint to sprint.

For example, There are database and UI experts in the team while there is not a single story in the sprint depends on UI/database.

How will these resources contribute to the sprint?

  • 2
    Step one: stop calling people resources.
    – Erik
    Commented Sep 17, 2018 at 10:27
  • Correction accepted! Any suggestion? How should I refer them?
    – ssharma
    Commented Sep 17, 2018 at 10:37
  • 2
    People, colleagues, employees, something along those lines?
    – Erik
    Commented Sep 17, 2018 at 10:50
  • Is your concern that people aren't being kept busy, that your stories aren't vertical slices, or something else? I think Erik's answer is a good one, but I'm trying to find the X in what may be an X/Y problem.
    – Todd A. Jacobs
    Commented Sep 17, 2018 at 23:19
  • Vertical slicing of stories is not a problem! It’s more about utilising speciality effectively!
    – ssharma
    Commented Sep 18, 2018 at 4:50

2 Answers 2


They will do other work that needs doing. Keep in mind that "being in the sprint" means that the story is important. Not being in the sprint means the story is not that important.

Looking for something that falls in line with a person's specialty is nice, and making sure that over the long term your team's capabilities align with the kind of work requires is a good practice.

However, in the short term, if in this sprint there happens to be no work that relates to someone's specialty, it means you need to make a choice. You've basically got two options:

A) let them work on something that is important but they cannot do as fast as their specialty

B) let them work on something that is not important but they can do full speed

Generally speaking, the solution here is to focus on what matters. Remember that being agile is about delivering the most value, not doing the most work.

If that means your database expert spends a few days building forms, or your UI specialist is building some test data, that's probably more valuable than having them make things that aren't important right now. It means you'll be able to deliver the big and important features at the end of your sprint. It means your team will be focused entirely on one thing and everyone will be working together, towards a common goal. And it means still having the expertise of these people available when it is needed, because they are not assigned "non-sprint-goal" tasks that they are expected to complete, thus making it more difficult for them to drop what they are doing to help out with what is important.

See also the Resource utilization trap. What matters at the end of your sprint is not how efficiently people work, or how code was written. You need to measure throughput, not effort. And you maximize throughput by doing what is important, not by doing what you're best at.


It's worth noting that a team is not only cross-functional, but also self-organizing. The team is empowered to use their skill constraints as a means to address work that is deemed valuable for the sprint goal.

This means the team can, and should, reach out to subject matter experts to help them understand their gaps in order to achieve the sprint goal. These gaps should be addressed during Sprint Planning, when the team works together to plan HOW they will manage their work during a sprint. Development Teams should be empowered by the organization to organize and manage their own work.

Changing Development Team members is not a advised mid-sprint, but if the Development Team believes that re-organization would help them to meet the Sprint Goal, they should be empowered to introduce other team members to the sprint, preferably before work begins.

  • This seems to be an almost word-for-word copy of your other answer. Is that intentional? pm.stackexchange.com/questions/12179/…
    – Erik
    Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 20:22
  • 1
    Both questions revolved around the same issue. With that in mind, I made sure to provide a consistent answer. Commented Sep 20, 2018 at 20:24
  • In these cases, I tend to think that either the answer is too generic of the questions are too similar. In this case, it seems the latter. Will comment that. Good spot, @Erik!
    – Tiago Cardoso
    Commented Nov 2, 2018 at 12:30

Your Answer

By clicking “Post Your Answer”, you agree to our terms of service and acknowledge you have read our privacy policy.

Not the answer you're looking for? Browse other questions tagged or ask your own question.