I have a project with 650 days of effort with 2 resources to work with. For both resource it is 8 hours per day. When I assign resource with 200% of allocation for all the task the resource is overallocated. And while doing the leveling to remove resource allocation the project timeline get extended to Next year. Which is not acceptable.
-
5The simple answer seems to be: don't assign someone 200%. Can you maybe clarify your question?– nvoigtCommented Nov 11, 2020 at 10:21
-
So you’re expecting two people to each work 16 hours per day for a whole year? There’s a sustainability flaw somewhere in your assumptions.– Todd A. Jacobs ♦Commented Nov 11, 2020 at 17:55
Add a comment
|
1 Answer
You need more resources.
- Restating your problem, you have two laborers to perform 650 person-days of effort. At perfect productivity, this effort will take 325 days of duration, which, using the standard calendar, extends well into the year AFTER next year – i.e. February 2022. No matter how “not acceptable” this is, it is the absolute best you can do without more resources.
- Left to its own rules, the resource leveler in MS Project is aimed at achieving “good enough” results, never the absolute best, so further delay is likely. Specifically, assuming that: a.) you have constructed your project schedule using a robust logic network, b.) you have used only a generic labor-team resource with a maximum availability of 200%, and c.) you have not overloaded this resource (i.e. no more than 200%) on any single task; then, d.) MS Project will delay less-important tasks compared to their logic-based early dates in favor of more important tasks that demand the same resources – as needed to stay within the 200% availability limit. e.) If some tasks have no resources assigned or are loaded with less than 200%, then the combination of logic dependencies and leveling delays may create idle time, thereby extending the project.
- As a rule, using non-generic resources (at max of 100%) is preferred, but a certain amount of finesse is still required.