Timeline for Discerning estimate validity
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
9 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Oct 7, 2012 at 15:43 | history | suggested | Bill the Lizard | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
fixed capitalization, punctuation, and typos; added image description
|
| Oct 7, 2012 at 15:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Oct 7, 2012 at 15:43 | |||||
| Mar 15, 2011 at 18:47 | vote | accept | Ray | ||
| Mar 15, 2011 at 15:08 | comment | added | Alexis Dufrenoy | Interesting method. I didn't know it yet... | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 14:52 | history | edited | Kennethvr | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
explained removal
|
| Mar 15, 2011 at 14:02 | comment | added | Kennethvr | You are correct, let me rephrase: by removing the extremes, I mean that they are removed because of the arguments in the dicussion. but you have a good point yegor256: extremes are there for a reason, if the arguments are good they should be taken into account. | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 13:57 | comment | added | yegor256 | Sometimes it is very dangerous just to "remove extremes". Maybe an extreme is the right estimate? | |
| Mar 15, 2011 at 12:09 | history | edited | Kennethvr | CC BY-SA 2.5 |
added extra motivation to the answer
|
| Mar 15, 2011 at 11:54 | history | answered | Kennethvr | CC BY-SA 2.5 |