Timeline for Do you include testing in the original estimate?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| S Feb 3, 2015 at 12:11 | history | suggested | harpun | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
including => include
|
| Feb 2, 2015 at 22:15 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Feb 3, 2015 at 12:11 | |||||
| Jan 29, 2015 at 14:03 | answer | added | pksnj | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 29, 2015 at 6:38 | comment | added | Philipp | Quick answer: It depends What are you using the estimate for? | |
| Jan 28, 2015 at 20:56 | answer | added | Jon Luzader | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 27, 2015 at 2:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/#!/StackProjects/status/559900586016272384 | ||
| Jan 25, 2015 at 8:12 | answer | added | Kurt | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 24, 2015 at 4:40 | answer | added | Vicki Laidler | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 22, 2015 at 18:52 | comment | added | Shawn | Story points are complexity. If you use story points, you are suppose to also use estimates for time, they are not mutually exclusive. Also you then can start to understand when complexity of "8" is chosen from your past sprints how much time was estimated versus actual. At that point if your team estimates "8" you look and see oh on the average that is 24 hours of work. Story points allow for relational time comparisons easily because without them estimating pure time is going to be moot and not any better than guessing 2000 hours because of the uniqueness of each item of work. | |
| Jan 21, 2015 at 22:43 | answer | added | Barnaby Golden | timeline score: 3 | |
| Jan 21, 2015 at 17:55 | answer | added | Tom Peters | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 21, 2015 at 15:35 | answer | added | Michael | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 21, 2015 at 11:12 | answer | added | Nikhil Gupta | timeline score: 7 | |
| Jan 21, 2015 at 5:27 | answer | added | Manoj Agarwal | timeline score: 2 | |
| Jan 20, 2015 at 21:32 | history | edited | iamthestreets | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 6 characters in body
|
| Jan 20, 2015 at 21:31 | comment | added | iamthestreets | @WBW I think you are way over thinking my question. I am not expecting the answer to be yes. I am expecting an explanation behind the answer. This was meant to be a simple question with a simple answer which I have accept below as he has explained a reason of why I might include testing in our original estimate base on what we consider as done. | |
| Jan 20, 2015 at 20:08 | comment | added | WBW | The way you phrase the question implies that you are expecting the answer to be yes. What are you trying to accomplish with including/excluding QA testing hours in the original estimate? What decisions do you make based off the original estimate? Why didn't story points work for your team? Are you phrasing your question in terms of running an Agile-Scrum team? | |
| Jan 20, 2015 at 17:31 | vote | accept | iamthestreets | ||
| Jan 20, 2015 at 15:29 | answer | added | David Arno | timeline score: 11 | |
| Jan 20, 2015 at 14:26 | review | First posts | |||
| Jan 21, 2015 at 16:26 | |||||
| Jan 20, 2015 at 14:24 | history | asked | iamthestreets | CC BY-SA 3.0 |