Timeline for What is the point of a risk with no impact?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
2 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 11, 2015 at 13:39 | comment | added | Marv Mills | I would disagree with your last line. If you have mitigated the risk, the risk should be closed- it no longer exists. If there is another risk that your mitigation actions might fail then that should be raised as a separate risk as it will have different causes, different mitigation and different outcomes to the original risk. I believe one should always strive to keep the risk log "clean" and only show real current risks. If it is not real or current it has no place on the risk log and only serves to conceal the real risks behind noise and confusion about what is real and current. | |
| Nov 5, 2015 at 12:58 | history | answered | Doug B | CC BY-SA 3.0 |