Timeline for Client with conservative UAT policy
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
14 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
S Jul 8, 2019 at 10:07 | history | suggested | Tiago Peres | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
Remove tag from title, see more here how to write good titles https://meta.stackexchange.com/a/10648/364217
|
Jul 8, 2019 at 8:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Jul 8, 2019 at 10:07 | |||||
Mar 2, 2016 at 3:50 | vote | accept | Pittsburgh DBA | ||
Feb 29, 2016 at 19:40 | answer | added | Todd A. Jacobs♦ | timeline score: 5 | |
Feb 29, 2016 at 19:39 | answer | added | MrHinsh - Martin Hinshelwood | timeline score: 2 | |
Feb 29, 2016 at 9:36 | comment | added | Bartek Kobyłecki | Scrum gives most ROI when there is no technical debt, such as unpredictable legacy systems. In such cases, if Scrum is believed to be the best approach, I would advice to make it more reliable first. At the same time you wrote that Scrum is not necessity, so my answer was more about solving a problem, not solving a problem within Scrum framework. | |
Feb 29, 2016 at 6:27 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackProjects/status/704191203965870080 | ||
Feb 29, 2016 at 5:41 | comment | added | Pittsburgh DBA | Thank you. The objective would be to have less risk to delivery. So, ideally, it would incorporate the UAT cycle into the sprint, but find things for developers to do to avoid slack when the release is a low-defect version. The reason UAT is a challenge is because the project is an extension to a legacy system that has many inter-dependencies. A determination must then be made as to whether the issue was pre-existing, caused by new code, or caused somewhere downstream because A invoked B, then A invoked C, but B directly or indirectly altered the state of C, in a less than obvious way. | |
Feb 29, 2016 at 2:19 | answer | added | Cort Ammon | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 29, 2016 at 1:59 | answer | added | Andrew Savinykh | timeline score: 1 | |
Feb 28, 2016 at 22:48 | comment | added | Bartek Kobyłecki | I'm not sure what exactly you're trying to improve here. Interruptions? Scrum Guide compliance? I'm not also sure what are the reasons for failures that are being reported after UAT. Are they related to the quality of staging environment? If you share more details, I'll update my answer. | |
Feb 28, 2016 at 22:47 | answer | added | Bartek Kobyłecki | timeline score: 4 | |
Feb 28, 2016 at 21:40 | review | First posts | |||
Feb 29, 2016 at 9:37 | |||||
Feb 28, 2016 at 21:35 | history | asked | Pittsburgh DBA | CC BY-SA 3.0 |