Timeline for Is backlog refinement (grooming) waste?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sep 19, 2016 at 17:18 | comment | added | Alan Larimer | The terminology was changed in the 2013 version: scrumguides.org/revisions.html | |
| Sep 16, 2016 at 18:28 | history | tweeted | twitter.com/StackProjects/status/776850355808264197 | ||
| Sep 15, 2016 at 10:31 | history | edited | Eirik M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Removed HTML from heading.
|
| Sep 15, 2016 at 10:15 | comment | added | Venture2099 | Just an aside; the industry no longer supports the term "Grooming". The Scrum Guide has replaced it with the word "Refinement" out of deference for the UK where the word grooming will likely paint you in a negative light with any and all stakeholders. I don't want to get into a debate about the logicalness of it; it is just the way the UK is as the word grooming is now largely reserved for predatory sex crimes on children. When British people hear grooming they think crime and a particularly heinous one. | |
| Sep 14, 2016 at 20:39 | answer | added | Barnaby Golden | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 14, 2016 at 8:11 | vote | accept | Eirik M | ||
| Sep 13, 2016 at 23:55 | answer | added | RubberDuck | timeline score: 6 | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 17:41 | comment | added | Pedro | The product owner owns the backlog. Why is he/she not acting as a gatekeeper for what gets added? | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 16:12 | comment | added | Todd A. Jacobs♦ | Backlog items should be managed at different levels of granularity as they approach the top of the backlog. Tons of overly-granular stories are a project implementation smell. | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 14:36 | answer | added | VaeInimicus | timeline score: 2 | |
| Sep 13, 2016 at 14:11 | history | asked | Eirik M | CC BY-SA 3.0 |