Timeline for What is the difference between titles "lead" and "manager" [closed]
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aug 27, 2019 at 5:19 | history | closed | Todd A. Jacobs♦ | Not suitable for this site | |
| Sep 24, 2016 at 6:41 | answer | added | Azad Johari | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 23, 2016 at 9:23 | answer | added | TTKDroid | timeline score: 4 | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 17:51 | comment | added | Todd A. Jacobs♦ | Managers generally hold more organizational authority than leads, but there are always exceptions. I knew a VP once whose official title was "Junior Assistant Web Monkey." YMMV. | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 15:06 | review | Close votes | |||
| Sep 22, 2016 at 0:57 | |||||
| Sep 21, 2016 at 15:06 | answer | added | recursions | timeline score: 1 | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 14:47 | history | edited | MCW | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
edited title
|
| Sep 21, 2016 at 12:57 | comment | added | David Espina | You will not find a consistent answer. Every organization is free to label their levels as they see fit. For large, complex organization or project, you can have a lead over a manager who is over a lead who is over a manager...or other fancy titles. If you want to gauge scope of a role, look at both number of people managed and money managed. Those are the two most reliable indicators of role scope. | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 12:53 | answer | added | nvoigt | timeline score: 5 | |
| Sep 21, 2016 at 11:59 | review | First posts | |||
| Sep 21, 2016 at 13:12 | |||||
| Sep 21, 2016 at 11:57 | history | asked | Adrian | CC BY-SA 3.0 |