Timeline for Product Breakdown Structure, deliverables for Software
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
13 events
when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
---|---|---|---|---|---|
Aug 8, 2018 at 20:00 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jul 9, 2018 at 19:20 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
Jun 9, 2018 at 18:41 | history | bumped | CommunityBot | This question has answers that may be good or bad; the system has marked it active so that they can be reviewed. | |
May 10, 2018 at 18:14 | answer | added | Paul Sweatte | timeline score: 1 | |
Jan 21, 2017 at 10:20 | comment | added | Gürkan Çetin | Although mandatory to create and manage, Testing documents are not part of your deliverables. They are intermediate process documents. so you can probably get them off the list. Product is what customer pays and takes away (software, documents, training materials, etc). | |
Dec 5, 2016 at 13:44 | comment | added | Estra | From what I have down so far would I be right in believing I shouldn't group the documents unless I have another collective grouping in mind for software. | |
Dec 5, 2016 at 13:41 | history | edited | Estra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 358 characters in body
|
Dec 5, 2016 at 13:16 | comment | added | MCW | Which way is more closely tied to the way the customer perceives value? (in my experience, documentation only has value when closely coupled with the software). | |
S Dec 5, 2016 at 12:40 | history | suggested | Werner |
This question is about the Product Based Planning technique from PRINCE2.
|
|
Dec 5, 2016 at 8:03 | comment | added | Werner | Both options are possible, collective groupings are just a convenient way to group some products. It would help us if you could share (part of) the PBS you have so far. | |
Dec 5, 2016 at 7:59 | review | Suggested edits | |||
S Dec 5, 2016 at 12:40 | |||||
Dec 5, 2016 at 0:32 | review | First posts | |||
Dec 5, 2016 at 2:53 | |||||
Dec 5, 2016 at 0:30 | history | asked | Estra | CC BY-SA 3.0 |