Timeline for Big 4 scrum consultant giving bad advice - correct or let fail?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
8 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 10, 2018 at 12:26 | answer | added | Barnaby Golden | timeline score: 8 | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 19:48 | answer | added | Ashok Ramachandran | timeline score: 1 | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 18:46 | history | edited | dqm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 9 characters in body
|
| Jan 9, 2018 at 18:46 | comment | added | dqm | SF = Sales Force. Corrected it. Because they are trying to enforce a style which I personally find useless. Since the work is established and finite, I find little use of the morning meeting. Nothing's wrong with it, I just think it's just an overhead as it stands. "Ok you had your meeting, now go back to do your actual work" | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 18:44 | comment | added | Sarov | Try not to use so many acronyms. I removed the ones I could, but I'm not sure what you meant by 'SF'. Also, why the (?) after stand-ups? | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 18:42 | history | edited | Sarov | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 58 characters in body; edited title
|
| Jan 9, 2018 at 18:37 | answer | added | Alan Larimer | timeline score: 6 | |
| Jan 9, 2018 at 18:25 | history | asked | dqm | CC BY-SA 3.0 |