Timeline for Allowing additions to a running sprint in Scrum
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
11 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 8, 2018 at 22:47 | comment | added | Roberto Allende | Thank you very much for your comment. You're right, I thought the time box as part of the goal but I think you're right on making the time box explicit. I'll update the answer asap. | |
| Feb 8, 2018 at 6:02 | comment | added | DesignerAnalyst | Another factor is the time box of the sprint. | |
| Feb 7, 2018 at 23:29 | history | edited | Roberto Allende | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 20 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 23:04 | history | edited | Roberto Allende | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 1 character in body
|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 22:57 | history | edited | Roberto Allende | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 22:53 | comment | added | Roberto Allende | The answer has been updated with a more happy opening statement and better closing phrase. | |
| Feb 7, 2018 at 22:50 | history | edited | Roberto Allende | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 12 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 22:31 | comment | added | Alan Larimer | The opening statement is incorrect; perhaps due to your situational context or inexperience with the framework you believe it to be correct. To me, the opening question does not read as being "about an organization looking for the right process for its needs" and if it did I would consider a vote to close as off-topic (shopping list). That article contains inaccuracies regarding Scrum. | |
| Feb 7, 2018 at 21:19 | comment | added | Roberto Allende | Please, could you justify the -1 or read the question entirely, which is about an organization looking for the right process for its needs. | |
| Feb 7, 2018 at 19:09 | history | edited | Roberto Allende | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 2 characters in body; deleted 6 characters in body
|
| Feb 7, 2018 at 6:00 | history | answered | Roberto Allende | CC BY-SA 3.0 |