Timeline for MVP v. Phase 1 terminology
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
10 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Feb 25, 2020 at 20:13 | comment | added | Llewellyn | Would it help if you think of "phase" as synonymous with "iteration"? That seems to be how it's being used here. | |
| Feb 23, 2020 at 4:07 | history | edited | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
added 824 characters in body
|
| Feb 22, 2020 at 23:29 | answer | added | Andrii H | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 22, 2020 at 11:56 | answer | added | nvogel | timeline score: 0 | |
| Feb 21, 2020 at 21:58 | answer | added | ronnanon | timeline score: 1 | |
| Feb 21, 2020 at 19:44 | comment | added | Todd A. Jacobs♦ | Naming should convey information within your organization. You can call it "Stage 73: Wombat" if it makes people feel better. What does your charter or project glossary have to say on the subject? | |
| Feb 21, 2020 at 19:41 | comment | added | MCW | It would help to understand the impact on the program; as stated, this seems to be merely a matter of opinion for which SE can offer no authoritative answer. If we understood the impact on the program, we might be able to link it to the project management discipline. | |
| Feb 21, 2020 at 18:52 | comment | added | Sarov | "This is causing a lot of confusion across the program" Why? | |
| Feb 21, 2020 at 17:54 | review | First posts | |||
| Feb 21, 2020 at 18:52 | |||||
| Feb 21, 2020 at 17:53 | history | asked | John | CC BY-SA 4.0 |