Timeline for How can a SAFe team end a failing sprint early?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
7 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| May 4 at 18:07 | vote | accept | Toby Speight | ||
| Apr 29 at 5:07 | comment | added | Toby Speight | That's a fair point @Todd, and I think there's a belief here that "all teams must belong to an ART". And it does make sense when some PIs have dependencies and some don't - we can't know that until PI Planning. | |
| Apr 28 at 21:33 | comment | added | Todd A. Jacobs♦ | My question is why the whole ART isn't off-track if a given team can't meet its Sprint Goals. Are there no dependencies within the ART on the team's deliverables? If not, why is the team even doing those things? I realize this is technically begging the question, but it seems like an X/Y problem of sorts when a pragmatic answer (rather than a purely academic answer) depends a lot on how a team can "fail" a Sprint Goal without impacting the rest of the ART in some way. | |
| Apr 26 at 7:15 | answer | added | Toby Speight | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 24 at 11:47 | answer | added | Thomas Owens♦ | timeline score: 1 | |
| Apr 24 at 7:53 | history | edited | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
edited body
|
| Apr 24 at 7:46 | history | asked | Toby Speight | CC BY-SA 4.0 |