Timeline for Quick win or long term sustainability?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
5 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Apr 29, 2012 at 16:02 | comment | added | Trevor K. Nelson | Yes. Kind of the best of both worlds. You get to keep working as planned, but you've made the Owners aware of the issue so it can be included in future decisions. Nice job! | |
| Apr 28, 2012 at 8:20 | comment | added | Iain9688 | The question was asked when I was not sure which way to advise. I have now made my recommendation, which has been accepted, which is to acknowledge and monitor the risk, while sticking to the original plan. We have put in place a mechanism to mitigate the risk by bringing forward the analysis for the next phase and assigning this work to a very experienced designer who should be able to help us to avoid too much rework if we have made a mis-judgement. Was that what you thought I would do? | |
| Apr 28, 2012 at 2:16 | comment | added | Trevor K. Nelson | And that's fine. Recommendations are easier, especially when it's not your decision. :) And from your original question I think you already know which you'd recommend. ;) | |
| Apr 27, 2012 at 19:44 | comment | added | Iain9688 | +1 for reminding me that the ultimate decision lies with the client, and not with me. I would just add one thing, however: I will be expected to make a recommendation, and so it still remains valid to think about which option is better. | |
| Apr 25, 2012 at 4:59 | history | answered | Trevor K. Nelson | CC BY-SA 3.0 |