Timeline for Should communication be included in a WBS?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
3 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jun 24, 2013 at 11:41 | comment | added | Willl | True. I think I tend to include these kind of 'high level' meetings because (a) they often involve a lot of people and are therefore a scheduling risk and (b) they are often the first step in a large piece of work that will ultimately generate the deliverable. But it is a bit of sliding scale I suppose. I think it depends a little on how decision-making and comms work in an organisation. If it's highly structured you might need a more structured representation of communication. | |
| Jun 24, 2013 at 11:12 | comment | added | Stephan | Wouldn't it be the risk register that is a deliverable in your WBS, and not the required discussions to create it? | |
| Jun 24, 2013 at 11:01 | history | answered | Willl | CC BY-SA 3.0 |