Skip to main content
Tweeted twitter.com/StackProjects/status/1268512855948767233
added 9 characters in body; edited title
Source Link
Sarov
  • 14.8k
  • 5
  • 34
  • 64

Is gauging a teamsteam's performance using scores assigned by other stakeholders valuable?

We have a new way of gauging teams.

All the individuals involved (business owners, managers, stakeholders) except the team itself gauge how they felt the team did using a score. If the score is higher, they performed better and produced more, if itsit's lower, they didn't. It's a number given at the end of a sprintSprint, in retrospectiveduring the Retrospective, about the whole teamsteam's output.

Do other companies do this? Is it considered Agile? Can it show real insight?

Is gauging a teams performance using scores assigned by other stakeholders valuable?

We have a new way of gauging teams.

All the individuals involved (business owners, managers, stakeholders) except the team itself gauge how they felt the team did using a score. If the score is higher, they performed better and produced more, if its lower they didn't. It's a number given at the end of a sprint, in retrospective about the whole teams output.

Do other companies do this? Is it considered Agile? Can it show real insight?

Is gauging a team's performance using scores assigned by other stakeholders valuable?

We have a new way of gauging teams.

All the individuals involved (business owners, managers, stakeholders) except the team itself gauge how they felt the team did using a score. If the score is higher, they performed better and produced more, if it's lower, they didn't. It's a number given at the end of a Sprint, during the Retrospective, about the whole team's output.

Do other companies do this? Is it considered Agile? Can it show real insight?

'scores' could mean anything: self-assessed, individual vs team, etc.
Link

Is gauging a teams performance using scores assigned by other stakeholders valuable?

Became Hot Network Question
Source Link
User101
  • 190
  • 5

Is gauging a teams performance using scores valuable?

We have a new way of gauging teams.

All the individuals involved (business owners, managers, stakeholders) except the team itself gauge how they felt the team did using a score. If the score is higher, they performed better and produced more, if its lower they didn't. It's a number given at the end of a sprint, in retrospective about the whole teams output.

Do other companies do this? Is it considered Agile? Can it show real insight?